The Multiple Killer: Why Internal Staffing Guarantees a Lower Exit Valuation

An Objective Analysis for Private Equity and Portfolio Company Leadership

Every Private Equity investment is focused on a 3-5 year horizon, requiring predictable, cumulative EBITDA growth and a clean, scalable asset at exit. Today, achieving that growth demands mastery over core business software and data platforms.

The critical mistake most PortCos make is attempting to master this domain through internal staffing - a slow, complex, and ruinously expensive effort to transform a business that doesn't naturally do software engineering into one that does.

The path to maximizing the exit multiple lies not in the high-risk gamble of internal team formation, but in securing a long-term, governance-led partnership that guarantees outcomes, predictability, and sustained scalability.

I. The Fundamental Complexity of Building a Software Practice

The argument for an internal team is the illusion of control. The reality is that creating an effective, value-generating software engineering practice inside a non-technology business is incredibly complex and rarely yields positive long-term outcomes.

1. The Impossible Task: Hiring an Ecosystem

Software excellence requires an entire ecosystem, not just developers. The PortCo is forced to hire and manage:

• Engineering Leadership: A CTO/VP of Engineering capable of defining architecture and roadmaps.
• Specialized Roles: Product Managers, UX Designers, DevOps Engineers, and Security Architects.
• Recruiting Infrastructure: An internal team to continuously source, vet, and onboard highly scarce, expensive talent.

This process is slow, costly, and inherently risky. By the time the team is hired (often 9-12 months), the PE investment timeline has been severely compromised, pushing value creation further out and decreasing the internal rate of return (IRR).

2. The Sunk Cost of Continuous Overhead

An internal team represents permanent, inflexible fixed overhead. Software value generation is iterative and requires variable skills.

• The Cost of Idle Time: When an integration phase is complete, the Integration Architect is still on your payroll, incurring full cost for fractional or zero productivity.
• Talent Attrition Risk: High turnover in technology is endemic. Every departure triggers a costly, months-long restart of the hiring process, introducing massive execution risk that compounds over the 3-5 years.

II. The Critical Failure of Governance and Focus

The greatest long-term threat is not the cost of the team, but the failure of governance. Without external discipline, the PortCo's new internal team defaults to focusing on the wrong things, creating unscalable assets that jeopardize the exit.

1. The Loss of Focus (The Governance Gap)

An internal team often lacks the authority and cross-industry perspective to enforce discipline.

• Business Dictates Over Scalability: The business dictates processes, and the team builds automation around those same unscalable, legacy inefficiencies.
• Focus on Unimportant Work: Without mandatory governance programs from an external expert, the team prioritizes easily visible, low-value, high-complexity projects. This burns budget and time while neglecting the core drivers of revenue and efficiency.

2. Technical Debt: The Unseen Multiple Killer

Over 3-5 years, a lack of governance accrues massive technical debt (poor code quality, insecure architecture, weak documentation). This debt surfaces during the final due diligence process, leading to:

• Valuation Chips: The buyer discounts the asset due to the cost required to fix the underlying technology.
• Failed Integration: The platform is deemed too messy to integrate into the buyer's systems, severely limiting the pool of potential acquirers.

III. The Strategic Solution: Long-Term, Governance-Led Partnership

The winning strategy is a Platform Management as a Service model that replaces the high-risk internal team with a stable, predictable, and scalable long-term partner.

1. 3-5 Year Predictability and Budget Certainty

A high-quality partner replaces the variable, unpredictable cost of internal staffing with fixed-bid, budgetable deliverables aligned with the investment thesis.

• Risk Transfer: The partner assumes all risk related to talent attrition, recruiting time, execution delays, and budget overruns. The PE firm gains absolute budget certainty for the entire hold period.
• Flexible Scaling: As the PortCo grows, acquires new assets, or needs to pivot (common over 3-5 years), the partner provides instant, fractional scaling up or down without the PortCo having to hire or fire personnel.

2. Sustained Governance and The Exit Guarantee

A long-term partner ensures continuous value creation by bringing an external, objective mandate:

• Mandatory Guardrails: The partner instills the essential governance programs and guardrails that force development to focus exclusively on the high-value, low-complexity quadrant—ensuring every dollar spent creates a clean, scalable asset.
• The Full-Horizon View: The partner is committed to maintaining the platform's health for the entire 3-5 years. This sustained focus on security, documentation, and clean architecture guarantees the PortCo presents the most attractive, debt-free, and easily transferable asset possible, maximizing the exit multiple.

The Takeaway: Control the Outcome, Control the Exit

Trying to build an internal software engineering practice inside a PortCo is a 3-5 year exercise in compounding risk and cost.

The highest-return strategy is a long-term partnership that provides the specialized expertise, the budget certainty, and the continuous governance required to transform a company into a scalable digital asset.

Stop paying the sunk cost of control. Partner for the certainty of delivery, and secure your exit multiple.

‍